Monthly Archives: April 2012

The need for openness

There’s an excellent quote by Isaac Asimov: “Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.’

We’re in a day where democracy is seen to be the epitome of civilization – and yet we struggle with how to do it.  How do we honour the humanity of each person – even their right to think what they will – and yet to discern truths that can stand for all of us, giving each person the ‘benefit of the doubt,’ as it were? In many ways, this is the challenge of the legal system.  Truth, at least in part, has to do with determining right from wrong, and fair and just ways of relating.

It was said recently, after the Alberta election, that ‘city folk’ did not have the common sense of those living in rural areas.  (A witty response to that Alberta election comment quoted Steven Pinker saying that common sense is anything but common…)  Might it be that certain ‘common’ things and certain things that have ‘sense’ about them are actually determined, at least in part, by location?  Certainly we trust our neighbour differently depending on how well we know them; and we know our neighbour through interactions that may include leisure time or working together.  To me, it’s a gross generalization to make a statement about common sense and urban versus rural interpretations of that.

So how do we determine what is correct and what is false?  How do we determine right and wrong?  How do we determine what is sensible and nonsensical?

It seems to me that there is a general need for openness. Yes, we have certain standards set by certain institutions – we trust what accredited university professors who have published their research in established journals say!  But we also must be open to the traditions out of which stem so many of our cultural sensibilities and ‘basic assumptions’ (eg. we all know that it’s wrong to kill another person).

The need for openness requires giving another person the respect due simply by virtue of their being another person.  So: “I’m a person; my experience makes sense to me; I have worth, and therefore so do my ideas.”  The need for openness also requires seeking the good of all, which will keep in check ideas that begin to tread on the basic humanity of others.  This needs to influence how we build a democratic society, as well.


What kinds of things are essential?

If the church is to evolve into something new, or perhaps even die so something new can come into being, what kinds of things will be part of that new life?  I’d like to think that – while there’s lots that’s out-dated, perhaps even lacking in relevance, in the church – there are still parts that would be every bit of use in faith-community in the future.

Has the church become simply a set of dogmatic “dos and don’ts” and “believe this and don’t believe that”? Perhaps the return to a way of life is biggest, single-piece of Christian living that we might re-embrace.

It’s key that there be regular gatherings.  Community is essential to keeping people honest in their inter-personal relating.  It is important to have inter-generational groups, as well.  At the time of the Reformation (1530s, roughly), there was a return to including participation from the congregation in the liturgy.  Perhaps our liturgy would benefit from more participation, yet – sometimes using scripted words, sometimes leaving an opening for conversation.

It’s key that there be openness.  Jesus got into hot water for dining with the ritually impure, according to Jewish custom.  He got into trouble with the Roman Empire for empowering oppressed people.  These actions of Jesus were indicative of a radical openness to others – people not like him or the majority, or powerful.  Churches have become places of homogeneity, and we would do better to invite diversity again.

There needs to be vulnerability. Perhaps you’ve heard me say, or write, it before: when we sing together, when we eat together, when we share stories together, we are vulnerable with each other.  Faith community needs to be a place that fosters and supports creative and probing endeavour – and we do it together, laying ourselves bare in front of each other!

What about the institution?  It’s true that, as soon as we begin to put anything into writing (or even talk about it in detail), we limit the thing’s ability to ‘breathe.’  On the one hand, we struggle with grace in an institution that has created rules out of a hospitable and generous way of being.  On the other hand, we need some rules and criteria simply for standards, and an outline as to determining what and who we are, as followers of the way.  Perhaps what we need is a constant invitation to gracious dealing with one another – giving all the benefit of the doubt, so to speak.

All of this invites us into an alternative way.  If anything, faith community needs to draw us out of ourselves.  While we may become self-absorbed, we are invited to see the needs of others.  While culture may tell us that ‘bigger is better,’ we are reminded that not all things are to be measured the same way.  While politicians tell us that they have the answers to our communal questions, we step back and look at the common good and the communal need through grace-tinted lenses.

Let me say that I do not put this blog out there as a final product, but a piece in the broad conversation of who we are and who we might be.  This blog is always an ongoing conversation.  What do you see as essential in life together?  (…I intentionally use that ‘life together’ expression, conscious of the commemoration of Bonhoeffer this week, and his very deep reflections on life together and living the Christian faith.)

Perpetuating ignorance

Now that we’re past Easter Sunday, I can take a moment to write a blog (eg. get on a soap-box, as the case may be…).

It strikes me that, with the new atheist movement, most of its ‘legs’ are based on out-dated, stereotype-based conceptions of what Christianity is.  A recent example of this, in my experience, is of a posting on Facebook where a ‘demotivational poster’ with a picture of a crucifix, has the caption: “Easter: a day when we convince ourselves that someone with the ability to come back to life is actually making a sacrifice when they die.”  Now, had this been posted by someone with no knowledge of a more progressive view of the faith, I could have understood it; but it was posted by someone who knows that there are other views, and still defended their posting of it.  So, I take it as perpetuating poor stereotypes (which is ignorance), or an outright offensive slight to people who don’t believe that way (including myself).

To my mind, if we’re to work at dispelling poor stereotypes and dismantling ignorance, we need to let go of our previously-held notions.  There is no excuse.

If I knew better and still were to say something racist, for example, and have someone call me on it, and then justify my action by saying, “well, there are lots of people who believe that, or who have believed that” – wouldn’t that simply be an offensive and ignorant thing to do? (In effect, wouldn’t I simply be justifying a racist behaviour?)  Say nothing of how it actually works against a desire that people not be so ignorant.

Anyway… that is my rant for today.  A point that I would like to make, and something into which I would like to invite our church, is that we must find new and intentional ways of articulating what we believe.  There are many out there who want to be more enlightened; there may even be some who are receptive to a faith-perspective that is theologically-sound.  When it comes to dialogue with our atheist neighbours, I think we need to be able to speak about what we believe, how that affects our living, and even call them on their perpetuating of ignorance when they do it.

April, 2012 – Paradox newsletter

From the Pastor…

“unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains just a single grain;
but if it dies, it bears much fruit.

(John 12:24)

The new life story, this year, reminds me of the year my daughter, Caitlyn, was born.  She was born on Easter Monday, and the next day, her great-grandmother (my last-surviving grand-parent) died.  The Easter story of new life: both in the great joy of a beautiful baby, and in the sadness of death.

The symbol of a seed, being buried and “dying” is a striking one.  We may not think in terms of the seed dying, but all of its “seed-liness” vanishes when it makes way for the new plant that comes to life.

I’m conscious that we, as a community of faith, are going through a grieving and dying process.  Even as part of our ELCIC, we are experiencing death.  But perhaps these are deaths that will lead to something new – some new life that we can not conceive of now.

Perhaps we are a seed that, in dying, will bear much fruit.  -Pastor Tyler Gingrich

* * * * * * *

Wounded, Weeping

Even the sparrow finds a home in your presence, O God,
the wren nests safely in your care.
Look upon me with tender love,
for I, your wounded bird, can neither fly
nor sing your praise.

My heart is broken,
my strength is gone,
my helplessness laid bare.

Gather me beneath your wing;
enfold me with your mercy.
Restore in me the image of your love;
Christ, the wounded healer.


(Susan Briehl, Marty Haugen Turn My Heart, pp.2-3)

* * * * * * *


– to Delores, and Lynette and Arno for the soup on March 18th!

– to Jack for all his work with our finances!

– to Paul for his eloquence at our congregational meeting

– to Karen for her faithful service on Advisory, doing deposits, offering rides

– to Lynette for getting word out about All Saints in creative ways!

* * * * * * *



It does not matter how astutely we move the pieces on the chessboard. The game of life and death is a game we lose. Perhaps there will be a final reckoning at the end, a looking back on it all, but more likely our last moments will be devoted to summoning the momentous energy to gulp down one more breath among blinking lights and the hum of the hospital monitors. I have seen enough of death to know its ugly and tawdry face. It is coming. It comes for all of us. Time is short. Life is brief.

Love means living for others. Many parents know this sacrifice, not the temporary sacrifice made to assist another, but the daily sacrifice to create life at the expense of our pleasure, career and dreams. There is drudgery and difficulty in this self-denial. It is not easy. But by giving up parts of ourselves for others, by accepting that we must be willing to lose life to create and preserve life, we honor the core of the [Ten] commandments. The commandments hold out to us the possibility of love. Those who have this love are able to receive and give love to others. Those who do not know this love live in Dostoyevsky’s hell. The worst torment in life…is the torment of being exiled to a life without love. Love is the mysterious life force that comes closest to putting us in touch with the power and majesty of God. It is the spark of divinity we carry within us. It is what we pass on to others. It is life. The more we reach out to sustain life, as individuals, as communities and as a nation, the more we affirm that which we know we must affirm.

Chris Hedges, Losing Moses on the Freeway, pp.172-173

* * * * * * *

“In three words I can sum up everything I’ve learned about life. It goes on.”  -Robert Frost

* * * * * * *

Lutheran Women
2012 Spring Event – May 5th

at Christ Lutheran Church
cost: $7
contact: Laura Loge

register by April 29

* * * * * * *

Ascension Day Church Music Festival – May 17th!
Mark the date, and join in making a joyous noise!

* * * * * * *

Worship leaders in April…

Readers – April 1, Katrina; April 5, ______; April 8, Jesse; April 22, Karen; April 29, Lynette

Hosts – April 1, Denney; April 8, potluck breakfast; April 22, Jensen; April 29, Plamondon

Liturgists – April 1, Darlene; April 8, ______; April 22, ______; April 29, _________

Soup on April 15 – Plamondon, Jensen

* * * * * * *

find our calendar of activities online here.